The reaction to Giroud has been sharp. Some viewers reportedly described the decision to use the former France striker as “desastrosa” and argued that other voices should be prioritised for upcoming matches.
Yet public frustration does not automatically translate into an editorial U-turn. Broadcasters typically weigh a commentator’s wider value - experience, profile and chemistry with the panel - against one difficult appearance. On that basis, Giroud’s position appears unlikely to change immediately.
The BBC faced a similar test with Neville after England’s defeat by Italy in Brazil. Cole later recalled that Neville “estava realmente sofrendo naquela noite quando falei com ele, mas se recuperou na manhã seguinte” - a difficult evening, followed by a return to work.
Neville remained part of the Match of the Day team during the following season before moving into coaching. His later career included managing England Women, Inter Miami and Portland Timbers, showing that a poor night in the studio did not define his long-term standing with the broadcaster.
The comparison is not perfect. Giroud is new to the role, while his playing career and public profile bring a different set of expectations. But the precedent matters: the BBC has previously resisted changing course because of a sudden wave of criticism.
Giroud’s experience as a high-level striker gives him credibility, but credibility must be matched by clarity, authority and television presence. The next assignment will reveal more than the first backlash.
For now, the likeliest storyline is not an immediate removal but whether Giroud receives another prominent slot - and whether his commentary improves quickly enough to quiet the critics.