Hajime Moriyasu deserves credit for building a side that is feared across Asia and increasingly respected worldwide. Since taking charge in 2018, he has overseen Japan’s rise into a disciplined, technically strong team with players competing at the highest club level.
Yet the recurring concern is what happens when the margins tighten. Japan have now lost all five of their World Cup knockout matches, including a defeat by Brazil after conceding in the 96th minute. The issue is not a lack of structure or preparation. It is whether Japan continue to play on the front foot when the pressure peaks.
Postecoglou was clear about that during his analysis of Japan’s performances. “Do that from the beginning,” he said, insisting the team could show more bravery. He also described them as “very risk-averse” when they had the quality to take games to stronger opponents.
The attraction is not simply his reputation. Postecoglou spent three and a half years with Yokohama F. Marinos, winning the J.League title and reshaping the club’s footballing identity. His attacking approach demanded initiative, courage and belief in possession.
That experience gives him an unusually deep understanding of Japanese football, its culture and its player pool. He would not need to start by explaining the environment; he would need to convince Japan’s best players to trust their instincts for longer.
A change would carry risks. Moriyasu has created stability, and Postecoglou’s demanding style requires time and authority. He has also reportedly been linked with other national-team vacancies.
But Japan may not need another coach to make them dominant in Asia. They may need one who can make them believe they belong among the world’s best.
The next Asian Cup should be the first major test of that belief - and a natural deadline for deciding whether Moriyasu remains the right man or Postecoglou represents the bolder future.