The current format has long faced criticism for asking players to juggle too much, too quickly.
That is the core argument behind the proposal. In football terms, more space between matches should mean cleaner preparation, fresher squads and, potentially, better football in the decisive weeks of the season.
The proposed structure would spread the season across both semesters rather than forcing everything into one rush.
That would bring the college game closer to a more sustainable competitive rhythm, even if coaches will still need to manage long gaps, roster turnover and winter conditioning.
The other significant shift is off the pitch.
That could create a more concentrated market, with less lingering uncertainty around squads but more urgency in recruitment decisions.
The next key moment is the Division I Cabinet review in June. If the plan is ratified, the real debate will begin: whether a split season can finally give college football the balance it has been chasing for years.