By the report’s account, Stevens had the game in its hands for long stretches.
That is the profile of a team doing most things right. Territory, volume, pressure and repeat attacking phases were all there. The issue was the gap between chance creation and the second goal that would have killed the contest.
The clearest warning sign is the split between total attempts and end product.
Those moments matter. When one side is taking that many shots and corners, it usually needs cleaner execution in the box, not just more volume. A game can tilt on one missed second goal, and this one appears to have done exactly that.
There is no reason for panic after a display like this, but there is a lesson. Stevens seem to have shown they can overwhelm an opponent territorially. The next step is turning pressure into a more ruthless margin, especially when momentum is so one-sided.
If that edge arrives in the final third, the next fixture could look very different. The chance creation is there; now the storyline to watch is whether Stevens can make their dominance decisive.