The report says New Mexico United carried the greater threat before the break, forcing Charleston into a reactive first half and asking big questions of the visitors’ defending.
That matters because road games against a side comfortable in possession can turn ugly fast. Charleston, by the sound of it, never fully settled in the opening spell.
If Pirmann’s line framed the contest, the second half appears to explain why the defeat will linger. The report says Charleston improved sharply after the interval, found more space and spent longer on the ball.
There was, apparently, a real momentum shift:
Blackstock’s post-match view, as relayed in the update, was telling: New Mexico’s possession game and the altitude could wear opponents down, yet Charleston still felt they had broken through often enough to get something.
Losing narrowly is one thing. Losing after weathering the worst of the game and then failing to cash in on your best spell is another. That is why this reportedly felt less like a collapse and more like a missed opportunity.
Charleston now have little time to dwell. Their next test, according to the report, comes on 30 May at home to Detroit City FC - and the next storyline is obvious: can a stronger second-half display become a complete 90-minute performance?