2026 World Cup US Host Cities See Softer Hotel Demand

The booking numbers matter

The headline figures are hard to ignore.

  • In Miami, 45% of hotel owners reportedly expect a shortfall.
  • In Philadelphia and San Francisco, that rises to 75%.
  • In Kansas City, roughly 85% to 90% say bookings are below expectations.

That is the real concern. This is not one weak market. It appears to be a broad pattern across the US side of the tournament. For organisers and local businesses, the World Cup was meant to be a summer accelerator. Softer bookings suggest the usual pre-tournament bounce has not arrived at the scale many expected.

Cost and access are shaping the mood

The reasons cited are practical as much as political.

  • Inflation and high fuel prices are weighing on travel demand.
  • Visa delays and uncertainty around immigration policy are affecting confidence.
  • Transport and matchday costs have become part of the problem.

Examples matter here. A match ticket priced at $1,000 has already drawn criticism. In Boston, a planned ride to Gillette Stadium was set at $80, up from a usual $20. In New Jersey, a World Cup fare from Penn Station to MetLife Stadium reportedly fell from $150 to $105 after backlash. That kind of pricing can cool demand quickly, especially for travelling supporters weighing a full tournament trip.

Why Miami may still outperform

If one US city is still relatively well placed, it is Miami. The report says its international profile, multilingual population and entertainment infrastructure remain advantages. Lionel Messi’s presence in the city is also seen as a major draw, and targeted Spanish-language marketing could yet help lift late demand.

The next 10 days look crucial. If host cities can sharpen travel packages, simplify messaging and ease supporter concerns around visas and transport, the picture may still improve before the first whistle.