VAR has not removed controversy; it has changed its shape.
That is where a review show can help. Scottish football has had no shortage of debate around handball interpretations, penalty-box contact and offside lines. A regular programme built around those flashpoints would at least move the conversation beyond raw outrage on a Saturday night.
The most interesting element is the reported involvement of Willie Collum. Putting the head of refereeing in front of viewers would signal a more open approach from the game’s officials.
That would matter for two reasons:
There is risk, of course. Every explanation will be dissected. But transparency usually beats silence when trust is fragile.
A show like this also has value beyond controversy. It can educate viewers on protocol, thresholds for intervention and the limits of technology. That does not guarantee agreement, but it can lower the temperature around the most misunderstood calls.
The next question is simple: whether this becomes essential viewing or just another battleground in the endless argument over officiating. As the 2026/27 campaign unfolds, the reaction to the first major review will be worth watching almost as closely as the matches themselves.