After a major match, viewers expect sharp questions, tactical explanation and strong personalities who can read the game. Instead, the live programme has reportedly leaned on loose jokes, audience reactions and an atmosphere built around drinks and casual conversation.
The criticism is not that football coverage must be solemn. Tournament television can be lively and funny. The problem is balance. When humour becomes the main event, the football risks becoming background noise.
Rio Ferdinand was expected to provide authority as a former England defender with major tournament experience. Yet the report describes his contribution as underwhelming.
In one cited exchange, Ferdinand was asked whether three red cards in Mexico versus South Africa were good for the game. His response was “entretenimento” - entertainment. That may reflect the show’s playful tone, but it is hardly the kind of analysis that explains why the match unfolded as it did.
The choice of guests has also raised questions. Mila Kunis reportedly said she knew little about “soccer” before offering a lengthy story unrelated to the match. Celebrity appearances can work, but only when they complement the football rather than replace it.
The irony is that Corden appears more comfortable when the programme is planned. The report gives a warmer assessment to recorded segments involving the United States team, Mauricio Pochettino, Declan Rice and Kylian Mbappé.
Those features offer room for preparation, atmosphere and better conversations. They also allow Corden’s enthusiasm for football to come through without the pressure of filling every live minute.
The next test is whether the show can adjust during the tournament. Unless the live format adds more substance and sharper football voices, its recorded features may remain the strongest reason to watch.