The reasoning described is tactical rather than a judgement on Foden’s ability. Jude Bellingham is already viewed as England’s primary central attacking outlet, while Tuchel reportedly wanted fewer natural number 10s competing for the same spaces.
Foden’s versatility can be an advantage, but it can also create uncertainty in a tightly defined system. He is most dangerous when drifting between midfield and attack, receiving the ball in pockets and combining with runners. A manager seeking fixed roles may instead favour players whose responsibilities are easier to map.
The report also points to an inconsistent club season and concerns over fatigue. Those factors are not independently confirmed here, but they provide context for a decision that would otherwise appear difficult to explain.
England could gain a clearer midfield shape without Foden. Bellingham would have more authority between the lines, while the wider players could hold their positions and give the team greater defensive security.
The cost is obvious. Foden offers close control, combination play and the ability to unlock a deep defence with one pass. The report describes him as a player with 49 senior caps and a 2024 PFA Players’ Player of the Year award, underlining the scale of the omission.
Tournament football often rewards order, but knockout matches can turn on improvisation. Leaving out a player of Foden’s technical quality removes one of England’s most natural sources of invention.
The opening match against Croatia will provide the immediate test. If England control midfield and create chances through a disciplined structure, Tuchel’s selection will look calculated. If the team lacks creativity, attention will quickly return to the player left at home.