Wilshere reportedly considers Rashford’s recent form at Barcelona a strong argument for promotion. His pace, ability to beat defenders and willingness to attack space would give England a different outlet in a match where creativity from the flanks appeared limited.
The former midfielder’s position is that changing one winger is a relatively low-risk adjustment. Rashford can stretch a defence, carry the ball through pressure and provide the kind of individual moment that England lacked for long periods against Ghana.
The report says Wilshere felt Tuchel waited too long before changing the wide areas, with Rashford and Morgan Rogers arriving only in the closing stages. That criticism is less about the personnel than the timing: tournament matches can turn quickly, and late substitutions leave little room to influence the result.
Tuchel’s challenge is to preserve England’s structure without allowing control to become caution. Starting Rashford would represent a clear attempt to inject greater urgency from the first whistle.
Wilshere also reportedly defended Tuchel’s demanding treatment of Spence, arguing that players respond differently to strong reminders. The “Wake up!” moment may be viewed as firm management by some and unnecessary pressure by others.
Spence’s place could now be under review, but the main selection debate remains in attack. England’s next lineup will show whether Tuchel shares Wilshere’s belief that Rashford is the simplest route to a sharper performance against Panama.