Hussain said he missed matches during a visit to the United States because of a family matter, but had followed reports of problems surrounding the tournament.
He cited accounts of supporters from different countries being prevented from entering stadiums over security issues. He also pointed to claims that several teams brought their own food because of doubts about catering quality and safety.
Those claims remain matters for organisers to address, rather than established conclusions. Yet even the perception of disorder can damage a World Cup, where supporters travel across borders expecting clear rules and a shared celebration.
Security checks are essential, particularly at an event of this scale. But they must be consistent, properly communicated and applied without turning the matchday experience into a barrier course.
Food provision carries a similar responsibility. Players need confidence in the facilities around them, while fans deserve basic standards in the stadiums they have travelled to reach. Hussain’s comparison with cultural performances captures football’s broader appeal: people come together precisely because the game can temporarily overcome national, social and political differences.
The United States, alongside Mexico and Canada, will be judged not only on stadiums and transport but on how openly it responds when problems arise.
The next storyline will be whether organisers can provide convincing assurances on entry procedures, supporter treatment and food standards. For the 2026 World Cup, successful hosting will mean ensuring that the tournament’s promise of unity is visible far beyond the opening whistle.