Montagliani’s rise has been shaped by coalition-building across CONCACAF. The report portrays him as a leader who expanded the confederation’s competition programme and brought national associations closer to the centre of decision-making.
That approach could matter as much as the tournament itself. A smoothly delivered World Cup would strengthen his credibility among football officials, particularly if the North American partnership produces lasting commercial and sporting benefits.
Yet any future presidency bid remains speculation. The next leadership cycle will be decided by alliances, reform promises and the ability to satisfy a broad range of member associations.
The sharper criticism comes from Canada. Montagliani helped shape the framework that preceded the Canadian Soccer Business arrangement, which has remained a flashpoint during disputes over national-team funding and player relations.
A report says the deal’s legacy has contributed to political scrutiny, internal upheaval and legal conflict. Critics also question whether football leaders can act as regulators while overseeing the sport’s commercial interests. Miguel Maduro, a former governance official, has argued that this overlap can reward loyalty and make meaningful challenges less likely.
Montagliani’s defence is that the system has evolved. “Now it is one big happy family and I think it is going really well,” he said.
For all the talk of , Montagliani’s own preferred role remains closer to the pitch. “If somehow God said, 'You're fit and you can play and you're 25 years old?' I'm in.”
The immediate storyline, however, is executive rather than personal. The 2026 World Cup will test whether his coalition-building can withstand operational pressure, commercial criticism and the expectations placed on Canada’s biggest football event.