The argument for retaining the breaks is straightforward. The 2030 World Cup is scheduled across Spain, Portugal and Morocco, while 2034 is set for Saudi Arabia. Managing heat will remain a central tournament issue, particularly when matches are played in demanding conditions.
The report says the current format uses three-minute interruptions in each half and was applied across all 104 matches, rather than only games played in extreme heat. That consistency supports competitive equality, but it also means the rule affects the character of every fixture.
For coaches, the stoppages create an additional intervention point. A match that once unfolded across two uninterrupted halves is now divided into four tactical phases, allowing teams to adjust their press, defensive line or attacking shape more deliberately.
That can protect players, but it also reduces the spontaneity that defines football. Critics argue the pauses interrupt momentum and make late-game management more structured. Concerns about commercial opportunities will also remain, as natural breaks can provide extra space for broadcasters and sponsors.
president Gianni Infantino has argued that the policy is about player welfare and competitive integrity. The report says the final assessment will come after the current tournament, leaving the governing body to balance medical evidence against complaints about rhythm.
The next test is whether can show that the breaks deliver a clear safety benefit without distorting the sport. Until that review is complete, continuation for 2030 and 2034 remains a strong possibility - but not a confirmed rule.