The structural change is significant: the eventual champion must navigate one more knockout tie than under the traditional 32-team format. That adds another test of fitness, squad depth and in-game adaptability.
More teams also mean a wider variety of styles. A highly rated side may face a compact defensive opponent, a direct counter-attacking team and an unfamiliar tactical problem within a short period. Reports suggest the expanded route will reduce the margin for error, even if it does not remove the advantage enjoyed by elite squads.
The biggest winners could be teams that manage energy rather than simply dominate possession. One poor performance will carry greater weight when the tournament includes another elimination hurdle.
Spain bring technical control and a clear possession identity. England have depth across the pitch and increasing experience in major tournament knockout games. France retain elite athleticism and individual match-winners, while Argentina carry the authority of recent tournament success.
Those strengths matter more in a long competition. The extra knockout round may expose weaknesses, but it also rewards teams with multiple solutions and reliable substitutes. The leading nations are better equipped than most to absorb a difficult match without losing their title challenge.
Morocco’s run to the 2022 World Cup semi-finals changed perceptions of what an African team could achieve at the highest level. Their defensive organisation, transition threat and collective belief make them a dangerous opponent in a format built around fine margins.
Reports identify Morocco as the standout challenger beyond Europe’s and South America’s traditional powers. Their ceiling will depend heavily on the draw, but another deep run is no longer an unrealistic expectation.
The draw and squad selections will shape the next chapter. The key storyline will be whether the favorites manage the heavier route-or whether Morocco turns the expanded format into another historic opportunity.