An account of England’s last-32 victory says DR Congo’s opening goal came down Spence’s flank. The report also says he was later withdrawn, with Declan Rice finishing the match at right-back.
That sequence matters. A substitution followed by a midfielder filling the position can quickly become a judgement on defensive reliability, particularly when the player is already under scrutiny. Spence’s pace and ability to carry the ball remain valuable, but England need assurance that those qualities do not come at the cost of control.
The criticism has extended beyond Spence’s performance. John Terry reportedly questioned the way Tuchel handled the defender during the match, while also expressing doubts about Spence’s defensive level.
Terry’s reported description of the situation as “mixed messaging” captures the problem. Tuchel’s continued selection of Spence points to belief, but visible frustration and an early withdrawal create a different impression.
Questions about Spence’s attitude have also resurfaced after reports of previous incidents involving managers and substitutions. Those claims remain commentary rather than established fact, but they have intensified the focus on every reaction and decision.
England’s alternatives appear uncertain. The update says Tino Livramento was injured before the tournament and Reece James missed the previous two matches, though those fitness details require confirmation.
Rice being used at right-back underlines the shortage. If that cover remains limited, Spence’s selection may reflect both trust and necessity. That gives him another opportunity, but it also leaves little room for another performance that invites questions.
The next England team sheet will provide the clearest signal. Another start would suggest Tuchel still prioritises continuity; a change would indicate that Spence’s defensive concerns have finally outweighed the lack of alternatives.