Argentina's Post-Messi No 10 Debate: Paz or Mastantuono

Nico Paz offers the clearest link

The case for Nico Paz rests on function rather than symbolism. A report highlights his close control, dribbling and ability to pass through compact defences, while goals in consecutive recent matches against Bolivia and Burkina Faso have strengthened his claim.

That profile fits the classic No 10. Paz can receive between the lines, turn under pressure and accelerate attacks without requiring the entire structure to run through him. The risk is obvious: asking him to imitate Messi would create an impossible standard. His role should be defined around chance creation and combination play, not constant comparison.

Mastantuono changes the question

Franco Mastantuono represents a more fluid option. The left-footer can operate centrally or from the right, giving Scaloni the possibility of using the No 10 as a rotating attacking position rather than a fixed berth.

The report says Mastantuono scored his first senior Argentina goal in the 7-0 win over Burkina Faso. At 19, he is a development project, not an immediate replacement. His value lies in the variety he offers: width from the right, movement inside and a willingness to attack defenders.

Alexis Mac Allister would take Argentina in another direction. His deeper role prioritises tempo, ball recovery and distribution, making the shirt a symbol of midfield control rather than individual invention.

Argentina can delay the decision

Scaloni has previously left the number vacant or shared it, and the report notes that tournament squads must use numbers from 1 to 26. That leaves room for a gradual transition.

After Messi’s reported farewell, the next international window will reveal whether Paz becomes the leading creator, Mastantuono grows into the attacking role or Mac Allister gives the shirt a deeper meaning. Argentina’s next No 10 does not need to replace Messi; the team needs to replace the functions he once covered alone.