Havertz offers familiarity. His movement can pull centre-backs away from the central channel, while his height gives Arsenal an outlet when opponents press high. He also understands the timing of Arsenal’s combinations better than a recent arrival.
That case becomes weaker when the main output expected from a centre-forward is missing. The reported goal drought means Havertz’s link play must create enough value to offset his lack of finishing returns. Against Liverpool, Arsenal may need more than intelligent movement if chances are limited.
Gyokeres would give Arsenal a different attacking profile. His power, pace and willingness to run beyond the defensive line could make Liverpool defend deeper and create space for Arsenal’s midfield runners.
However, a change of striker would not automatically solve the problem. Gyokeres is also reportedly struggling for goals, so his selection would be based on the possibility of changing the match rather than evidence of superior current form. The available form signal is negative for both players.
The safest decision is not necessarily the most ambitious one. Havertz provides structure, but Gyokeres could offer the sharper tactical switch if Arsenal expect Liverpool to hold a high line. A start for Gyokeres, with Havertz retained as an option from the bench, would be defensible-but only as a change of profile, not a guaranteed cure.
The Liverpool fixture should reveal whether Arteta values established combinations or seeks a new attacking threat. If neither striker ends the drought soon, Arsenal’s No 9 question will remain one of the defining storylines of the season.