This is bigger than a facilities issue. It goes to the basic duty of care clubs owe players.
Non-league football often lives with inherited infrastructure. What once looked like a practical boundary can now appear out of step with the speed and space of the modern game.
If the report is accurate, the practical impact could be significant.
That creates a familiar tension in English football: safety standards versus limited budgets. Many clubs operate on tight margins, so even sensible upgrades can become difficult without clear timelines or financial help. The FA may now face pressure not just to set the rule, but to support compliance.
There is also a wider message here. Stadium safety discussions usually focus on supporters, barriers and crowd flow. This development appears to put player safety at the centre of ground regulation.
That feels overdue. Football has modernised in coaching, medicine and surfaces; its older perimeter design was always likely to come under closer scrutiny eventually.
The next step is whether the FA follows this reported change with detailed enforcement dates, funding guidance and inspection standards. That will decide whether this becomes a meaningful turning point or simply the start of another difficult compliance race for clubs lower down the pyramid.