What makes Son’s view interesting is that it separates admiration from judgment. He is not trying to “win” the debate. He is drawing a line between the player he believes many will see as the greatest and the one who influenced him most.
That is often how elite players talk about icons. They do not always pick the most decorated name. Sometimes they pick the one whose work, habits and mentality felt reachable - or at least worth chasing.
For many professionals, Ronaldo has long represented the idea that excellence can be built and rebuilt. Son reportedly pointed to his longevity and dedication, and that helps explain the loyalty he still inspires. Ronaldo’s supporters often see more than goals and trophies; they see discipline, reinvention and standards that refuse to slip.
Son also reportedly said, “Both make a huge impact for football.” That is the key. This is not a dismissal of Messi. It is an acknowledgment that the argument depends on what matters most to you: natural genius, or relentless self-construction.
Messi has the artistry, the World Cup glow and the sense of inevitability that has defined an era. Ronaldo has the edge of obsession, the durability and the example that many younger stars openly tried to follow. Son’s answer captures why the conversation remains alive: greatness can be universal, but inspiration is always personal.
That is why this debate will keep returning with every new chapter in both legacies - and with every player brave enough to admit that heart and head do not always make the same choice.