Carrick’s case appears to rest on hard output.
At a club that has changed managers repeatedly without finding lasting momentum, a strong interim spell is not a small detail. It is the central argument. If the team is winning, climbing, and looking more settled, the board does not need to overcomplicate the picture.
Carrick’s supporters will also point to his previous work at Middlesbrough.
That matters because it shows more than a short-term bounce. It suggests he can build over months, manage pressure, and keep a side competitive across league and cup football. It is not the same as running United, but it is relevant evidence.
The risk is obvious. A strong interim run is one test; leading United through a full season, with European football and two domestic cups, is another. That demands squad management, consistency, and authority over a longer cycle.
Still, if the club truly wants fewer short-term swings and more continuity, Carrick looks like a logical choice. The next step is whether that internal belief becomes a formal decision before the World Cup - and whether United keep producing the results that have put him in pole position.