The argument for selection is built on experience, authority and a recent scoring record that still carries weight. The report points to Ronaldo’s prolific 2025 Nations League campaign and his role in Al Nassr’s league success as evidence that he remains capable of deciding important matches.
That matters in a World Cup, where one penalty, one late movement or one moment of composure can change an entire campaign. Stickle’s view is shared by those who believe Ronaldo’s value extends beyond his running: he remains a trusted figure when pressure reaches its peak.
The counterargument is about balance rather than reputation. Zach Mallias argued that “there are players who fit the system better,” reflecting concerns that Portugal may need greater mobility and pressing from its central striker.
A different forward could offer more movement between the lines, help trigger Martinez’s press and create space for Portugal’s younger attackers. The question is whether those benefits outweigh Ronaldo’s finishing instinct and authority inside the penalty area.
Recent major tournaments have intensified the scrutiny. The report notes a subdued return at the 2022 World Cup and a scoreless Euro 2024, while also describing debate over how Ronaldo might respond if his role were reduced.
For Martinez, this is not simply a decision between experience and youth. It is a test of whether Portugal can preserve Ronaldo’s influence while giving the team enough flexibility to change shape during matches.
The update says Ronaldo remains firmly projected to lead the line, but Congo will provide the first evidence of whether that choice gives Portugal control or creates another tactical complication. The next storyline will be how quickly Martinez adjusts if the balance is not right.