A national team cannot thrive when its domestic structure is unstable. The update says uncertainty around the Indian Super League has affected clubs, players and long-term planning, with concerns over delayed seasons, incomplete squads and financial pressure.
That matters beyond the club game. A reliable league gives Indian players regular high-level competition, allows coaches to build continuity and creates a stronger environment for emerging talent. If clubs are struggling to operate, the national team inevitably pays the price.
The reported churn around India’s men’s and women’s teams raises another uncomfortable question: what is the football identity being developed?
Changing coaches can be necessary, but constant uncertainty makes it harder to establish a playing style or build trust with young players. India needs a properly connected pathway from youth teams to the senior side, alongside more opportunities for Indian coaches to gain elite qualifications and experience.
The women’s programme also requires consistency. Decisions around appointments, roles and tournament preparation should be guided by a long-term plan rather than short-term reactions.
Sandhu’s call for responsibility should not become a search for one scapegoat. The federation, clubs, coaches and players all have a role in fixing the system.
A change of branding or a new slogan cannot replace transparent administration, a dependable domestic calendar and serious investment in development. The immediate priority is not to make India look like a World Cup contender, but to make progress measurable and sustainable.
The next Asian qualifying cycle will offer the clearest test. India’s response should begin with the standard Sandhu identified: qualify consistently, compete with conviction, and only then raise the World Cup conversation.