Ranjit Bajaj Said He Was Not Consulted

A process that raises questions

Bajaj’s frustration, as the report describes it, is less about personalities and more about planning.

“I had absolutely no idea,” Bajaj said. “Nobody from the AIFF had spoken to me before the announcement.”

That matters. In youth football, roles cannot be improvised. If a federation is building a tournament staff, clarity has to come first:

  • Who leads the project
  • Who scouts the players
  • Who sets the training plan
  • Who is responsible for long-term continuity

Bajaj also said: “I don't see the logic behind appointing me as manager and Bibiano as coach together.” It is a pointed line, but it speaks to a wider issue - youth teams need aligned ideas, not hurried pairings.

Why the timing is the real story

The sharper criticism may be about the clock. “Youth football is about long-term planning,” Bajaj said. “You don't start building a World Cup team two months before the tournament.”

That is the heart of it. Youth development is not just about picking the most promising names at the last minute. It is about:

  • Repeated camps
  • Clear scouting across regions
  • Players learning a style together
  • Staff building trust before the first match

If preparations are late, even talented groups can look undercooked.

The bigger issue for Indian football

Bajaj has long been one of the loudest voices around grassroots development, and this row appears to have touched a nerve because it fits an old pattern: Indian football often talks about youth reform, but too often the structure arrives after the urgency.

With the tournament due in Azerbaijan in October, the next move matters more than the noise. Whether Bajaj is involved or not, the storyline to watch now is simple: can the AIFF turn a messy start into a coherent plan for India U-15 before time runs out?