The sharpest reaction has been to the cost of travel.
That matters because World Cup planning is not only about capacity; it is about access. If the cheapest practical option becomes a scramble and the rail option carries a premium far above normal rates, the pressure shifts onto roads, pick-up zones and already stretched local systems.
The bigger issue may be infrastructure rather than price.
That is the real concern for and local organizers. Tournament optics matter, but reliability matters more. A final should feel seamless, not like a regional stress test.
Driving does not look like an easy escape route.
That leaves organizers with a narrow window to improve the fan experience before the tournament arrives. The next storyline to watch is whether transport plans are adjusted again - because if access remains this expensive and this fragile, MetLife Stadium could become a case study in how infrastructure shapes the biggest match in football.