Phelan’s memories of USA 94 are built around freedom, spontaneity and a sense of welcome. He recalls Ireland’s squad moving around with few restrictions, mixing with supporters and even being invited out by local police during their stay in Orlando.
That atmosphere feels a long way from the environment described ahead of 2026. The report says recent arrivals have faced rigorous searches and difficult entry processes, while concerns have also been raised about officials and players being delayed or restricted once inside the country.
Phelan’s central fear is that teams and supporters could spend too much time navigating bureaucracy rather than enjoying the tournament.
The expanded World Cup will already place heavy demands on teams travelling across a vast host nation. Phelan is particularly concerned about arrangements that leave players arriving immediately before matches or departing soon afterwards.
“When a team has to fly in on the same day, go and play, and then fly out again, it's sad,” he said.
That concern extends beyond fatigue. A World Cup is also a cultural event, and the best tournaments allow fans from different countries to meet, travel and create memories between matches. Expensive tickets and complicated entry requirements could make that experience feel exclusive or tightly controlled.
Phelan is not dismissing the importance of security. His argument is that safeguards should not erase the warmth and openness that make a World Cup distinctive.
The next storyline to watch will be how organisers, host cities and national teams respond as 2026 approaches. If access improves and supporters feel welcome, the football can still define the tournament. If not, Phelan’s warning may remain part of its story long before the opening match.