Australia Weigh Attacking Options Before Türkiye Opener

The closest like-for-like option

Tete Yengi appears to be the most natural deputy. He is the squad’s other recognised striker and would preserve a conventional centre-forward structure, giving Australia a fixed target for early passes and crosses.

The report notes that Yengi has made only two appearances for Australia. That limited international exposure could influence Popovic’s choice, particularly in an opener where defensive security and attacking efficiency carry immediate importance.

Mobility could reshape the front three

If Popovic prefers movement over a traditional reference point, several alternatives offer different solutions:

  • Nestory Irankunda could operate as a lone forward, stretching Türkiye with pace.
  • Nishan Velupillay offers central speed after playing as a striker for Melbourne Victory.
  • Mathew Leckie could lead the press as a mobile forward rather than a fixed target.

Those options would shift responsibility for hold-up play and goals across the attacking unit. Irankunda and Velupillay would add acceleration, while Leckie could provide experience and disciplined pressing from the front.

Two plans before kickoff

The limited training access makes firm conclusions difficult. Toure’s presence at the venue means the situation should not automatically be treated as a confirmed injury, but Popovic will still need a clear alternative structure if his main striker cannot start.

The next training update and player media appearances should offer more clues. Until then, Australia’s biggest selection question is whether to replace Toure directly or change the way the entire front line attacks Türkiye.