Under the reported system, Iran’s squad is required to leave its Mexican base no more than a day before each fixture. After the match, the delegation must return rather than remain in the host city to recover and prepare.
For any international team, that routine can affect rest, training schedules and match preparation. The disruption is particularly significant during a World Cup, when squads normally establish a settled rhythm between games.
Ghalenoei’s criticism reflects the frustration within the Iranian camp. His complaint is not simply about comfort; it concerns whether his players can prepare on equal terms with the rest of the field.
Officials have reportedly defended the restrictions as part of a wider security plan for the tournament. The United States says the priority is protecting teams, supporters and visitors, while maintaining enhanced monitoring around the competition.
The report also says all Iranian players and coaching staff received entry permission, although some delegation members were not granted visas. That detail has added another layer to an already sensitive dispute.
The next key moment comes after Iran’s match against Belgium in Los Angeles. Officials are expected to reassess the travel policy after that fixture, with the delegation’s arrangements for the meeting with Egypt in Seattle still open.
Until then, Iran must focus on football while carrying an unusual burden away from the pitch. The post-Belgium decision could determine whether the team finishes the group stage under the same restrictions - or finally gains greater freedom to prepare.