Ronaldo reportedly cut an isolated figure against DR Congo, reinforcing concerns that Portugal’s attack can become predictable when too much depends on him. The national team still has creative players around him, but the argument is that their roles are being adjusted to preserve Ronaldo’s status rather than maximise the collective.
Harry Brent’s verdict is severe. He writes that Ronaldo’s “monstrous ego is crippling Portugal” and says it is “time for him to sod off and hang it up”.
Those words go beyond criticism of finishing or movement. They challenge Ronaldo’s influence over selection, attacking shape and the rhythm of Portugal’s play. Brent argues that his continued presence has “derailed any chance Portugal might have had of winning the World Cup”.
That remains an opinion, not an established verdict. Ronaldo’s experience, penalty-taking and ability to decide major matches still give Portugal a reason to hesitate before making such a dramatic change.
The column also turns to goalkeeper enforcement, using England’s 4-2 win over Croatia as its case study. Harry Kane saw a penalty saved after a stuttering run-up, only for the kick to be retaken when the Croatian goalkeeper moved marginally off the line.
Brent accepts there was encroachment but argues the balance has shifted too far towards takers. A goalkeeper can be punished for the smallest movement, while a striker can use hesitation to disrupt the contest.
The two arguments share a theme: rules and reputations can begin to shape football more than performance. Portugal must decide whether Ronaldo remains the focal point or becomes a situational option.
The next major test will be whether the team’s attacking structure improves when the pressure of carrying its most famous player is reduced.