Pejic’s argument is structural. Stoke need midfielders who can screen the centre-backs, react quickly after turnovers and close spaces before opponents reach the penalty area. That work often goes unnoticed until a gap opens directly in front of the defence.
The former player also wants a more fluid unit, with players able to rotate, move the ball forward and attack space behind the opposition back line. For Stoke, that would mean greater value from possession rather than simply retaining the ball.
Reported interest in Galbraith would make sense if Stoke are seeking greater mobility and passing range. The Swansea midfielder has been linked with the club, although the move should not be treated as confirmed.
The more important question is squad balance. Stoke need options for different match states:
Pejic reportedly believes the shape should adapt to the opponent, with combinations that can include advanced midfielders, deeper players or two strikers.
His concerns extend beyond Stoke. During the World Cup, Pejic criticised excessive sideways and backward passing, short build-up structures that invite pressure, and poor defensive organisation at set pieces. He also questioned VAR consistency in incidents involving England against Ghana, including challenges involving Jordan Pickford and Ezri Konsa.
Those examples reinforce his central footballing principle: possession has value only when it creates control, territory or chances.
The next transfer window will reveal whether Stoke follow that blueprint. Their clearest storyline is whether the midfield becomes more athletic, adaptable and secure-or whether the same gaps continue to define the team.