The tactical criticism is supported by the match profile described in the report. The Netherlands finished with just 35% possession and spent much of the contest in a deep defensive shape.
Ibrahimovic reportedly argued that the team looked uncomfortable without the ball and offered too little going forward. For a side expected to control possession and build through midfield, that approach created a clear tension between Koeman’s caution and the Netherlands’ established footballing image.
Thierry Henry also reportedly questioned Koeman’s use of a 5-4-1 formation. The change prioritised defensive cover, but it removed a midfielder and handed Morocco greater control in the centre of the pitch.
That choice can be defended when it protects a lead. It becomes far more exposed when the team concedes and has no attacking rhythm to fall back on. The report says Henry viewed the system as a sign of fear, particularly because it differed from the way the Netherlands are normally expected to play.
The account says Cody Gakpo put the Netherlands ahead in the 72nd minute, only for Issa Diop to equalise with a header in the 91st after a defensive lapse. Morocco then reportedly took control during extra time.
Bart Verbruggen is said to have kept the Netherlands alive with a save from Soufiane Rahimi, before Ismael Saibari converted the decisive penalty. The sequence gives Koeman two problems to solve: the failure to protect the lead and the lack of an attacking response after the equaliser.
The next international window will determine whether Koeman restores a more proactive approach or continues to prioritise defensive security. The tactical identity of the Netherlands is now the central question surrounding his tenure.