Timber had spent several months recovering from a serious groin injury and had not played for more than two months. Yet Arteta introduced him in the 66th minute of the final, which Arsenal eventually lost on penalties.
From Arsenal’s perspective, the appearance may have been viewed as a controlled return in a major match. For the Netherlands, however, it was a gamble that offered limited sporting reward while carrying obvious physical risk.
The KNVB said Timber had “não se recuperou suficientemente” - had not recovered sufficiently - to compete in a “medicamente responsável” way. He was subsequently removed from the squad’s preparations.
Reports suggest members of the Dutch delegation were extremely frustrated by the decision to use Timber so soon after his injury. The defender was considered an important option for Ronald Koeman, particularly because of his versatility and ability to operate from the right side.
Instead of building momentum with the national team, Timber was left to continue his recovery away from the tournament. Lutsharel Geertruida took the opportunity created by his absence, but replacing a player of Timber’s profile is never straightforward.
Was Arteta reckless, or was Timber genuinely ready for a short appearance? The available evidence leaves room for both interpretations. A player can be cleared to play without being fully prepared for the physical demands of a tournament soon afterwards.
That distinction is at the heart of the anger. Arsenal were focused on one final; the Netherlands were planning for an entire World Cup campaign. The next test will be Timber’s recovery and whether he can return consistently without another setback.
For Arsenal, the episode will also remain a warning about the fine line between managing a comeback and accelerating it for the biggest night of the season.