The report says the case began in 2023 and was advanced towards trial after a decision by the Versailles Court of Appeal on June 19. No trial date has been set, with proceedings reportedly expected in France later this year.
That development is not a verdict. Hakimi remains accused, not convicted, and has repeatedly denied the allegation. His public position was reinforced after the decision, when he said: “Justice looked me in the eyes and told me: 'If you weren't famous, there would never be a case'.”
The accuser has also said she wants a trial “to defend myself, to be heard”. Those competing positions underline why the legal process, rather than the football debate, must ultimately determine the facts.
Morocco’s decision to retain Hakimi reflects the tension between sporting leadership and public accountability. He is one of the country’s most important players and a prominent figure in the squad, but wearing the captain’s armband gives the issue greater visibility.
Coach Mohamed Ouahbi has publicly backed him, describing Hakimi as “extraordinary” and “the best right-back in the world”. Supporters may point to the absence of a conviction and the principle that allegations must be tested in court. Critics will argue that a player awaiting trial should not represent a nation, particularly as captain.
The controversy has already followed Hakimi onto the pitch. The report says he was booed by Scottish supporters during an earlier Morocco fixture, showing that the World Cup stage will not separate football from the case.
When Morocco face Canada, every touch from Hakimi is likely to attract attention. The result will matter, but so will the next legal update-and how Morocco responds if the scrutiny intensifies.