The award’s history includes controversies rooted in eligibility rather than voting. Until 1995, only European players based in Europe could compete, excluding icons such as Pelé, Diego Maradona, Mario Kempes and Romário.
The 2020 cancellation also remains a major talking point. The pandemic ended that edition, removing a global opportunity for players whose form peaked during that season. Unlike a normal defeat, there was no winner to debate and no second chance for those affected.
Several results remain central to the Ballon d’Or debate:
Other outcomes, including Michael Owen ahead of Raúl in 2001 and Kevin Keegan winning in 1978 without a major team trophy, underline the shifting weight given to reputation, silverware and statistics.
The recurring problem is that the Ballon d’Or is treated as one award but judged through several lenses. Some voters prioritise the best individual season; others favour the player behind the biggest trophy. International tournaments can dominate an entire calendar, while club consistency may receive less attention.
That tension will return at the next ceremony. The key storyline will not only be who wins, but whether voters can define the award’s criteria clearly enough to make the result feel credible.