McAtee’s reputation has been built on invention rather than volume. His movement between midfield and attack allows him to receive in pockets, turn under pressure and connect with the forward line.
The early-season trend is clear: he has been among the more creative players in the division. That makes his positioning against Palace especially important. If he can find space between Palace’s midfield and defence, Forest could gain a route through the centre rather than relying solely on wide attacks.
The report’s claim that Glasner has developed McAtee should be treated cautiously, but the change in role appears significant. He is no longer being viewed simply as a technical prospect; he is being asked to set the tempo.
Wharton’s value comes from his composure, passing range and ability to control the rhythm of a match. McAtee is a more naturally attacking player, yet the comparison points to a similar demand: influence the game through intelligent positioning and clean distribution.
That could make the midfield battle decisive. Palace will want to limit McAtee’s time on the ball, while Forest need him facing forward often enough to release their attackers. The side that controls those central spaces may control the match.
This fixture will show whether McAtee’s creative start can survive a more structured defensive challenge. Palace’s organisation under Glasner should make central access difficult, placing greater emphasis on McAtee’s movement and decision-making.
The next storyline is whether he can turn promising creativity into decisive end product. Against Palace, that development faces a meaningful test.