Eze began England’s 3-0 win over the Czech Republic on the left before switching into central midfield for the final 20 minutes or so. The change did not diminish his influence; it gave him more opportunities to receive between the lines and dictate attacks.
Asked whether he preferred a wide role or a central one, Eze added: “I don't really mind, to be honest. I feel like they're both different. They both have pros and cons and there's different challenges in both positions.”
That flexibility is central to his appeal. From the flank, Eze can carry the ball inside, isolate defenders and create openings. In midfield, he can operate closer to the striker and look for pockets of space behind the opposition’s press.
Tzolis’ absence leaves Arsenal with a straightforward selection problem, but Eze’s versatility offers more than a like-for-like replacement. Starting wide could give the team greater ball progression and individual threat, while using him centrally would preserve his strongest creative qualities.
The decision may depend on the opponent, the balance of Arsenal’s midfield and how much freedom the manager wants to give Eze. His ability to change position during matches also allows Arsenal to begin with one plan and finish with another.
The next Arsenal fixture should reveal whether Eze is trusted primarily as Tzolis’ cover or as a player capable of moving between roles throughout the campaign. Either way, his England cameo has strengthened the case for keeping him involved wherever the game demands.