Montiel’s case carries obvious weight. His last act in a World Cup final was to score the winning penalty in 2022, and the report says he could replace Nahuel Molina at right-back.
Molina reportedly struggled to contain England’s Anthony Gordon and Djed Spence during Argentina’s 2-1 semi-final victory. Montiel would offer Scaloni a more conservative option, particularly against a Spain side expected to test Argentina’s defensive discipline from wide areas.
The decision is not simply about reputation. A final can be shaped by small defensive errors, and Montiel’s experience in high-pressure matches may appeal to Scaloni if he wants greater security on the flank.
De Paul’s claim is based on influence rather than sentiment. Reports say he improved Argentina’s control and attacking tempo after coming off the bench against England, recording two key passes and creating one big chance.
That impact has strengthened his case to return alongside Leandro Paredes, Enzo Fernández and Alexis Mac Allister. Giuliano Simeone reportedly struggled to impose himself in midfield, while De Paul provided the urgency and ball progression Argentina needed during a difficult spell.
His inclusion would restore a familiar presence around Messi and give Argentina more experience in the centre of the pitch. It would also allow Scaloni to begin with a player who has already shown he can alter the game from either the start or the bench.
Argentina’s attacking structure is still expected to revolve around Lionel Messi and Julián Álvarez. The report says Messi shaped both goals against England with assists, reinforcing his importance even when he is not directly finishing chances.
Lautaro Martínez’s impact from the bench gives Scaloni another late option, but the greater question now concerns the starting XI. Sunday’s final against Spain will reveal whether Montiel and De Paul have done enough to reclaim their places.