The report says Stewart’s position contains an intriguing contradiction: he expressed support for Spain, but predicted Argentina to win. That distinction separates personal preference from football judgment - and his judgment is that the final will not follow the expected script.
Argentina’s appeal lies in its experience of high-pressure matches and its ability to turn tight contests with moments of individual quality. Spain, meanwhile, has earned its status as the more complete and convincing side. That contrast gives Stewart’s prediction its edge.
Stewart also described the meeting as a potential classic, saying: “The game between Spain and Argentina is just going to be one of the best I think we've ever seen.”
That confidence is not based on a specific statistical argument. It is a belief that the occasion, the quality on both sides and the tactical battle could produce a final remembered long after the tournament ends.
Spain’s control and structure may make it the logical choice, but Argentina can make the match uncomfortable by disrupting that rhythm and exploiting small defensive errors. In a final, one transition, set piece or piece of individual brilliance can outweigh weeks of strong form.
The report says Stewart has followed the tournament closely, with earlier calls involving Spain, France and Argentina. His forecast has therefore become part of the wider build-up rather than a throwaway television moment.
The final will provide the answer. If Spain’s strength prevails, the established order will be restored. If Argentina wins, Stewart’s warning about ignoring the paper version of the match will look remarkably prescient.