The report says Washington State received 14 votes in the coaches’ preseason top-25 poll, making them the only Pac-12 team to attract support. They did not enter the rankings, but the signal is clear: the Cougars are viewed as a credible contender despite major offseason change.
The reported recruitment of Montana’s core matters because it could shorten the adjustment period. Players arriving from a side that won its conference and reached the NCAA Tournament should bring a stronger competitive baseline than a conventional rebuild.
There is little room for Oregon State to ease into league play after the opener.
That sequence makes the Washington State fixture more than a standalone opener. It should establish whether Oregon State can compete with experienced teams while navigating a reshaped league.
The case for Washington State is built on the report’s 14-vote preseason signal and the arrival of Montana’s successful group. Oregon State’s opportunity lies in disrupting that expected continuity before the Cougars settle into their new structure.
The October 1 meeting should therefore be the first major storyline of the new Pac-12: Washington State’s rapid rebuild against Oregon State’s ability to handle a schedule that offers no soft start.