The criticism focused on a performance in which Wirtz struggled to influence Liverpool’s attacking play. Carragher argued that the German was ineffective, with little of the movement, creativity or authority expected from a high-profile attacking midfielder.
That does not make Wirtz a poor player. It does, however, underline the pressure that comes with joining a side expected to compete at the top end of English football. Liverpool need their creative players to remain involved, particularly when matches become tight and opponents deny them space between the lines.
Wirtz’s best work usually comes when he can receive possession in advanced areas, combine quickly and attack gaps around the striker. At Bournemouth, Carragher felt that influence was missing.
Carragher’s recommendation is significant: Wirtz should not be selected against Manchester City after the international break. That would be a firm response from Liverpool’s coaching staff, but it could also offer the player a chance to reset away from the spotlight.
The decision will depend on what Liverpool value most. Wirtz offers imagination and technical quality, while a more conservative midfield could provide greater control against City. The choice is not simply about punishment; it is about finding the right balance for one of the season’s most demanding fixtures.
Liverpool then face Arsenal, Brentford and Brighton, making the upcoming period even more important. A player who is left out against City could quickly regain his place if he responds positively in training.
Wirtz’s response will matter as much as Carragher’s criticism. One poor half should not define a major signing, but repeated quiet performances would intensify the debate.
Liverpool’s next fixture after the international break will reveal whether their manager trusts Wirtz to answer the criticism immediately-or believes the midfielder is better served by watching from the bench.